Research Scientist vs Staff Engineer

Put two roles head to head — any role, in any location or worldwide-remote.

Side A

Side B

Staff Engineer pays about 6% more at the median.

Side-by-side distribution

Research Scientist Staff Engineer
$200k
$211.9k
$101k box = 25th–75th · whiskers = 10th–90th $327.7k

Research Scientist

$200,000

median · per year, annualized USD

$150k 25th
$200k Median
$250k 75th
$116.7k
$312.1k
Box 25th–75th · whiskers 10th–90th Full range $39.3k – $862.7k · outliers off-axis
Disclosing
23.3%
Live roles
2,092

Staff Engineer

$211,850

median · per year, annualized USD

$165k 25th
$211.9k Median
$250k 75th
$125k
$300k
Box 25th–75th · whiskers 10th–90th Full range $6.9k – $1,500k · outliers off-axis
Disclosing
25.1%
Live roles
9,758

Research Scientist vs Staff Engineer: which pays more?

The median for Research Scientist is $200,000 per year (typically $150,000–$250,000), versus $211,850 for Staff Engineer ($165,015–$250,000). That puts Staff Engineer about 6% ahead at the median.

Both figures are computed live from active listings on JobsRadar and normalized to annualized USD, so Research Scientist and Staff Engineer are compared on equal terms regardless of the currency each role was originally posted in. Only roles that publish a salary range feed the medians; numbers refresh every few hours as new roles post and older ones close, so this comparison reflects the market right now rather than a fixed survey. Use it as a directional benchmark when weighing one path against the other.

Catch your next role the second it’s posted.

Create a free account and we’ll watch the boards for you — the instant a job matches your search, it lands in your inbox or Telegram. No digging, no refreshing.

Create free account

Free forever · takes 30 seconds · already have one?

Don't be the 201st applicant.

Every worldwide-remote role pushed to our Telegram the moment it goes live. Subscribers apply hours before this page even refreshes.

Subscribe — it's free